Case study · Insurance Claims

A motor claims team clears its backlog without adding adjusters

A mid-sized insurer receiving motor claim files from policyholders, garages and experts, with volumes that spike after every storm.

The client

Who they are.

A mid-sized motor insurer. Its claim files are assembled by three parties who never meet: the policyholder declares the loss, the garage invoices the repair, the expert writes the report. Volumes are flat most of the year and triple in the week after a storm.

Anonymised at the client’s request. Client names are never disclosed without written permission.

120kclaim files per year
7documents per file
11 minsaved per file
The task

What had to be solved.

Adjusters were opening every file to confirm the same identities, dates and amounts before any judgement could begin. Storm weeks produced a backlog that took a month to clear, and inconsistencies were often found after a first payment had been approved.

The goal

What success looked like.

  • Absorb a storm week without temporary staff
  • Put adjuster attention only on files where something disagrees
  • Catch a date or amount inconsistency before the first payment, not after
The solution

What Ceertia does here.

Eleven use cases covering the common loss types. Each declares the documents a complete claim file needs and the questions to answer across them — identity, chronology, amounts. Adjusters open a file already reconciled, with the disagreements listed and each one citing the two documents that contradict each other.

A real rule One rule, as it runs.

The loss date must be earlier than the repair invoice date — flag any file where the invoice predates the loss.

The procedure

How it runs, step by step.

1
Intake

The file arrives with its documents, in any format, from whoever sends it.

Claim declarationRepair invoiceDamage photosExpert reportPolicy schedulePolice report
2
Recognition & classification

Every page is identified and mapped against the expected document list. Missing documents, duplicates and out-of-scope pages are flagged on receipt.

3
Verification

Each rule asks the file a question and answers it directly on the documents, with page, zone and source text attached to the verdict.

4
Arbitration

The team approves, requests a fix, or rejects. No file is approved or rejected automatically.

The result

What changed.

Peak weeks stopped producing a backlog. The adjuster’s first minute on a file now starts with the exception list rather than with re-reading six documents to build one.

Before
  • Adjusters opened every file to confirm the same identities, dates and amounts.
  • Storm weeks produced a backlog that took a month to clear.
  • Inconsistencies were found late, after the first payment had been approved.
After
  • Files arrive pre-checked; adjusters see only what disagrees.
  • Peak weeks are absorbed without temporary staff.
  • Every flagged inconsistency cites the two documents that contradict each other.

Anonymised case. Client names are never disclosed without written permission. Figures describe the file volumes and checks in this scenario.

Insurance Claims All case studies

See it run on your own files.

Bring one real file to a 30-minute demo. Watch the verification run, evidence on screen.